Aug 27 2008
Obama’s Campaign wants Censorship or Jail time for Ad Against Obama!
Barack Obama’s campaign is trying to put people in jail for running an ad against Obama. Talk about censorship. Do we want a President that will limit freedom of speech when it comes to disagreeing with him?
The ad by American Issues Project is about Barack Obama and his long relationship with the terrorist Bill Ayers.
The Obama campaign came out with a retort ad and that doesn’t try to explain Obama’s connection with Ayers at all, instead he mentions John McCain. John McCain has nothing to do with the ad. American Issues Project is a non-profit organization that has followed all the rules to make this ad.
Bill Ayers was the founder of Weather Underground in the 1970s, which bombed many Government buildings. Obama had his state office fundraiser at Ayers’ house. Obama was also the head of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, which Ayers founded and was a guiding force. Obama has stated that Ayers was just, “a guy who lives in my neighborhood.” Obama is lying about his connection with Ayers, a self admitted terrorist who thinks he did not bomb America enough.
Obama is good friends with Wright, Pfleger, Ayers, and other terrorists and haters of America. How can America elect a President of the United States who has friends like these and wants censorship? Tell me who your friends are and I’ll tell you who you are.
Please direct me to this article that claims the Obama campaign is seeking legal action against the American Issues Project. If the AIP knowingly committed slander (which at this point, it seems they did), the campaign has every right to fight this vicious attack ad.
John McCain doesn’t seem to have anything to do with any ad. Does he want to become president, or does he just not want Barack Obama to be?
I am a Democratic fan and do not believe in censorship however please let us see the feed so that we can make up our own minds. I think too many times some speak before they think. All people (in one way or other) have had contact with someone (at some givin point in time) that they may not like or agree with. If we wanted to throw them all from office we would have non left. Just take a look and you will see what is in the past of eveyone in high up seats.
Sorry don’t get me wrong you have a great post here and a great debate question. I look forward to new ones.